Binarity and the abundance discrepancy problem in planetary nebulae
Romano Corradi (1, 2), Jorge Garc\'ia-Rojas (1,2), David Jones (1.2),, Pablo Rodr\'iguez-Gil (1,2) ((1) Instituto de Astrof\'isica de Canarias., Spain, (2) Universidad de La Laguna. Spain)

TL;DR
This study finds that planetary nebulae with close binary central stars exhibit the largest abundance discrepancies between different spectroscopic methods, suggesting a link between binarity and the abundance discrepancy problem.
Contribution
It provides new spectroscopic evidence connecting close binary central stars to high abundance discrepancy factors in planetary nebulae, and discusses potential explanations involving binarity and planetary interactions.
Findings
High abundance discrepancy factors (>50, up to 300) in nebulae with binary stars.
Existence of a cold, heavy-element enriched ionized component in these nebulae.
Low ionized masses (0.001-0.1 solar masses) in the observed nebulae.
Abstract
The discrepancy between abundances computed using optical recombination lines (ORLs) and collisionally excited lines (CELs) is a major unresolved problem in nebular astrophysics. We show here that the largest abundance discrepancies are reached in planetary nebulae with close binary central stars. This is illustrated by deep spectroscopy of three nebulae with a post common-envelope (CE) binary star. Abell 46 and Ou5 have O++/H+ abundance discrepancy factors larger than 50, and as high as 300 in the inner regions of Abell 46. Abell 63 has a smaller discrepancy factor around 10, but still above the typical values in ionized nebulae. Our spectroscopic analysis supports previous conclusions that, in addition to "standard" hot (Te~10000 K) gas, a colder (Te~1000 K) ionized component that is highly enriched in heavy elements also exists. These nebulae have low ionized masses, between 0.001…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
