Link between the Potentially Hazardous Asteroid (86039) 1999 NC43 and the Chelyabinsk meteoroid tenuous
Vishnu Reddy, David Vokrouhlick\'y, William F. Bottke, Petr Pravec,, Juan A. Sanchez, Bruce L. Gary, Rachel Klima, Edward A. Cloutis, Adri\'an, Gal\'ad, Tan Thiam Guan, Kamil Hornoch, Matthew R. M. Izawa, Peter, Ku\v{s}nir\'ak, Lucille Le Corre, Paul Mann, Nicholas Moskovitz

TL;DR
This study investigates the potential link between the Chelyabinsk meteoroid and asteroid 1999 NC43 through orbit, composition, and rotation analysis, ultimately finding the connection unlikely based on statistical, compositional, and rotational evidence.
Contribution
The paper provides a comprehensive statistical, compositional, and rotational analysis to evaluate the proposed link between Chelyabinsk and 1999 NC43, concluding the connection is improbable.
Findings
Orbit of Chelyabinsk is close to 1999 NC43 with low chance coincidence.
Compositional analysis shows Chelyabinsk and 1999 NC43 differ in mineralogy.
1999 NC43 exhibits tumbling rotation with non-principal axis wobbling.
Abstract
We explored the statistical and compositional link between Chelyabinsk meteoroid and potentially hazardous asteroid (86039) 1999 NC43 to investigate their proposed relation proposed by Borovi\v{c}ka et al. (2013). Using detailed computation we confirm that the orbit of the Chelyabinsk impactor is anomalously close to 1999 NC43. We find about (1-3) x 10-4 likelihood of that to happen by chance. Taking the standpoint that the Chelyabinsk impactor indeed separated from 1999 NC43 by a cratering or rotational fission event, we run a forward probability calculation, which is an independent statistical test. However, we find this scenario is unlikely at the about (10-3 -10-2) level. We also verified compositional link between Chelyabinska and 1999NC43. Mineralogical analysis of Chelyabinsk (LL chondrite) and (8) Flora (the largest member of the presumed LL chondrite parent family) shows that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
