Some conclusive considerations on the comparison of the ICARUS nu_mu to nu_e oscillation search with the MiniBooNE low-energy event excess
M. Antonello, B. Baibussinov, P. Benetti, F. Boffelli, A. Bubak, E., Calligarich, S. Centro, A. Cesana, K. Cieslik, D. B. Cline, A.G. Cocco, A., Dabrowska, A. Dermenev, A. Falcone, C. Farnese, A. Fava, A. Ferrari, D., Gibin, S. Gninenko, A. Guglielmi, M. Haranczyk, J. Holeczek

TL;DR
The ICARUS experiment conducted a sensitive search for muon-to-electron neutrino oscillations and found no evidence of excess events, challenging the MiniBooNE low-energy anomaly and suggesting it may be due to instrumental effects.
Contribution
This study provides new limits on neutrino oscillation probabilities and compares ICARUS data with MiniBooNE results, highlighting a persistent tension and questioning the origin of the MiniBooNE excess.
Findings
ICARUS sets limits of 3.4E-3 and 7.6E-3 on oscillation probability at 90% and 99% CL.
The tension between ICARUS limits and MiniBooNE excess is confirmed at 90% CL.
MiniBooNE low-energy excess may be due to instrumental effects or unknown phenomena.
Abstract
A sensitive search for anomalous LSND-like nu_mu to nu_e oscillations has been performed by the ICARUS Collaboration exposing the T600 LAr-TPC to the CERN to Gran Sasso (CNGS) neutrino beam. The result is compatible with the absence of additional anomalous contributions giving a limit to oscillation probability of 3.4E-3 and 7.6E-3 at 90% and 99% confidence levels respectively showing a tension between these new limits and the low-energy event excess (200 < E_nu QE < 475 MeV) reported by MiniBooNE Collaboration. A more detailed comparison of the ICARUS data with the MiniBooNE low-energy excess has been performed, including the energy resolution as obtained from the official MiniBooNE data release. As a result the previously reported tension is confirmed at 90% C.L., suggesting an unexplained nature or an otherwise instrumental effect for the MiniBooNE low energy event excess
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Neutrino Physics Research · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
