The MSO+U theory of (N, <) is undecidable
Miko{\l}aj Boja\'nczyk, Pawe{\l} Parys, Szymon Toru\'nczyk

TL;DR
This paper proves that the MSO+U logic, which extends monadic second-order logic with an unbounding quantifier, is undecidable over infinite words, resolving an open problem and improving prior results.
Contribution
It establishes the undecidability of MSO+U on infinite words, settling an open question and removing the need for additional axioms used in earlier proofs.
Findings
MSO+U logic is undecidable on infinite words
The result improves previous undecidability proofs
Settles an open problem in logic theory
Abstract
We consider the logic MSO+U, which is monadic second-order logic extended with the unbounding quantifier. The unbounding quantifier is used to say that a property of finite sets holds for sets of arbitrarily large size. We prove that the logic is undecidable on infinite words, i.e. the MSO+U theory of (N,<) is undecidable. This settles an open problem about the logic, and improves a previous undecidability result, which used infinite trees and additional axioms from set theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
