MPPC versus MRS APD in two-phase Cryogenic Avalanche Detectors
A. Bondar, A. Buzulutskov, A. Dolgov, E. Shemyakina, A. Sokolov

TL;DR
This study compares the performance of different Geiger-mode APDs at cryogenic temperatures for use in two-phase Cryogenic Avalanche Detectors, highlighting the superior performance of MPPCs over MRS APDs in dark matter detection applications.
Contribution
The paper provides a comparative analysis of six GAPD types at cryogenic temperatures, identifying MPPCs as more suitable than MRS APDs for two-phase CRADs in dark matter experiments.
Findings
MPPC S10931-100P shows higher detection efficiency.
Ceramic package GAPDs failed at cryogenic temperatures.
Plastic package MPPCs and MRS APDs operate satisfactorily at 87 K.
Abstract
Two-phase Cryogenic Avalanche Detectors (CRADs) with combined THGEM/GAPD multiplier have become an emerging potential technique for dark matter search and coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering experiments. In such a multiplier the THGEM hole avalanches are optically recorded in the Near Infrared (NIR) using a matrix of Geiger-mode APDs (GAPDs). To select the proper sensor, the performances of six GAPD types manufactured by different companies, namely by Hamamatsu (MPPCs), CPTA (MRS APDs) and SensL (SiPMs), have been comparatively studied at cryogenic temperatures when operated in two-phase CRADs in Ar at 87 K. While the GAPDs with ceramic packages failed to operate properly at cryogenic temperatures, those with plastic packages, namely MPPC S10931-100P and MRS APD 149-35, showed satisfactory performances at 87 K. In addition, MPPC S10931-100P turned out to be superior in terms of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
