(No) dimming of X-ray clusters beyond z~1 at fixed mass: crude redhshifts and masses from raw X-ray and SZ data
E. Churazov, A. Vikhlinin, R. Sunyaev

TL;DR
This paper discusses how X-ray and SZ signals from galaxy clusters at high redshift behave, suggesting that X-ray surveys can detect massive clusters beyond z~1 and that combined signals can estimate cluster redshifts and masses.
Contribution
It introduces a method to crudely estimate cluster redshifts and masses using raw X-ray and SZ data, leveraging their different scaling behaviors at high redshift.
Findings
X-ray flux does not decrease beyond z~1 for fixed mass clusters.
SZ signal remains detectable at high redshift, aiding cluster detection.
Combined X-ray and SZ data can estimate cluster redshift and mass crudely.
Abstract
Scaling relations in the LCDM Cosmology predict that for a given mass the clusters formed at larger redshift are hotter, denser and therefore more luminous in X-rays than their local z~0 counterparts. This effect overturns the decrease in the observable X-ray flux so that it does not decrease at z > 1, similar to the SZ signal. Provided that scaling relations remain valid at larger redshifts, X-ray surveys will not miss massive clusters at any redshift, no matter how far they are. At the same time, the difference in scaling with mass and distance of the observable SZ and X-ray signals from galaxy clusters at redshifts offers a possibility to crudely estimate the redshift and the mass of a cluster. This might be especially useful for preselection of massive high-redshift clusters and planning of optical follow-up for overlapping surveys in X-ray (e.g., by SRG/eRosita) and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
