Bound on Bell Inequalities by Fraction of Determinism and Reverse Triangle Inequality
P. Joshi, K. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, Ben, Li, S. J. Szarek, T. Szarek

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new mathematical bound based on the fraction of determinism and a reverse triangle inequality to quantify limitations on Bell inequality violations with 2 by n inputs.
Contribution
It establishes a universal upper bound on Bell inequalities for 2 by n inputs using the concept of fraction of determinism and a novel reverse triangle inequality.
Findings
Quantum correlations cannot reach algebraic bounds for 2 by n Bell inequalities.
Any quantum statistics with 2 parties and 2 by n inputs has a nonzero fraction of determinism.
Derived a universal upper bound for Bell inequality violations in this setting.
Abstract
It is an established fact that entanglement is a resource. Sharing an entangled state leads to non-local correlations and to violations of Bell inequalities. Such non-local correlations illustrate the advantage of quantum resources over classical resources. Here, we study quantitatively Bell inequalities with inputs. As found in [N. Gisin et al., Int. J. Q. Inf. 5, 525 (2007)] quantum mechanical correlations cannot reach the algebraic bound for such inequalities. In this paper, we uncover the heart of this effect which we call the {\it fraction of determinism}. We show that any quantum statistics with two parties and inputs exhibits nonzero fraction of determinism, and we supply a quantitative bound for it. We then apply it to provide an explicit {\it universal upper bound} for Bell inequalities with inputs. As our main mathematical tool we introduce…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
