Understanding the Fe I Line Measurements Returned by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager
Daniel P. Cohen, Serena Criscuoli, Laurel Farris, Alexandra Tritschler

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) measures Fe I line parameters, analyzing the accuracy and limitations of its data products influenced by solar conditions and instrumental effects.
Contribution
It provides a detailed assessment of the HMI's line measurement accuracy using atmospheric models and observational data, highlighting dependencies on viewing angle, magnetic field, and instrumental factors.
Findings
HMI estimates depend strongly on line shape and viewing angle.
The MDI-like algorithm fails in regions with magnetic fields >2000 G.
Instrumental effects induce periodic and long-term variations in measurements.
Abstract
The Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) aboard the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) observes the Sun at the Fe I 6173 {\AA} line and returns full-disk maps of line-of-sight (LOS) observables including the magnetic flux density, velocities, Fe I line width, line depth, and continuum intensity. These data are estimated through an algorithm (the MDI-like algorithm, hereafter), which combines observables obtained at six wavelength positions within the Fe I 6173 {\AA} line. To properly interpret such data it is important to understand any effects of the instrument and the pipeline that generates these data products. We tested the accuracy of the line width, line depth, and continuum intensity returned by the MDI-like algorithm using various one-dimensional (1D) atmosphere models. It was found that HMI estimates of these quantities are highly dependent on the shape of the line, therefore…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
