An Investigation of the Absolute Proper Motions of the SCUSS Catalog
Xiyan Peng, Zhaoxiang Qi, Zhenyu Wu, Jun Ma, Cuihua Du, Xu Zhou, Yong, Yu, Zhenghong Tang, Zhaoji Jiang, Hu Zou, Zhou Fan, Xiaohui Fan, Martin C., Smith, Linhua Jiang, Yipeng Jing, Mario G. Lattanzi, Brian J. Mclean, Michael, Lesser, Jundan Nie, Shiyin Shen, Jiali Wang

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed analysis of absolute proper motions for approximately 7.7 million objects from the SCUSS catalog, including error correction, validation with quasars, and comparison with SDSS data.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive correction and validation of proper motions in the SCUSS catalog, improving accuracy and reliability of astrometric data.
Findings
Systematic errors are estimated at -0.08 and -0.06 mas/yr.
Random errors are about 4.2 and 4.4 mas/yr.
Proper motions are consistent with SDSS data.
Abstract
Absolute proper motions for 7.7 million objects were derived based on data from the South Galactic Cap u-band Sky Survey (SCUSS) and astrometric data derived from uncompressed Digitized Sky Surveys that the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI) created from the Palomar and UK Schmidt survey plates. We put a great deal of effort into correcting the position-, magnitude-, and color-dependent systematic errors in the derived absolute proper motions. The spectroscopically confirmed quasars were used to test the internal systematic and random error of the proper motions. The systematic errors of the overall proper motions in the SCUSS catalog are estimated as -0.08 and -0.06 mas/yr for {\mu}{\alpha} cos {\delta} and {\mu}{\delta}, respectively. The random errors of the proper motions in the SCUSS catalog are estimated independently as 4.2 and 4.4 mas/yr for {\mu}{\alpha} cos…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
