
TL;DR
This paper disproves the strongest form of Hopkins' chromatic splitting conjecture at chromatic level 2 and prime 2 by showing specific non-vanishing homotopy groups that contradict the conjecture's predictions.
Contribution
It provides a counterexample at n=p=2, demonstrating that the conjectured decomposition does not hold in this case.
Findings
The homotopy group of L_1L_{K(2)}V(0) is non-zero at certain degrees.
This non-vanishing contradicts the predicted chromatic splitting decomposition.
The strongest form of the conjecture fails at n=p=2.
Abstract
We show that the strongest form of Hopkins' chromatic splitting conjecture, as stated by Hovey, cannot hold at chromatic level n=2 at the prime p=2. More precisely, for V(0) the mod 2 Moore spectrum, we prove that the kth homotopy group of L_1L_{K(2)}V(0) is not zero when k is congruent to -3 modulo 8. We explain how this contradicts the decomposition of L_1L_{K(2)}S predicted by the chromatic splitting conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
