Hubble Space Telescope Observations of Sub-Damped Lyman-alpha Absorbers at z < 0.5, and Implications for Galaxy Chemical Evolution
Debopam Som (1), Varsha P. Kulkarni (1), Joseph Meiring (2), Donald G., York (3, 4), Celine P\'eroux (5), James T. Lauroesch (6), Monique C. Aller, (7), Pushpa Khare (8) ((1) University of South Carolina, Department of, Physics & Astronomy, (2) University of Massachusetts

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Space Telescope data to analyze four sub-DLA absorbers at z<0.5, revealing their near-solar metallicities, chemical compositions, and implications for galaxy evolution, doubling the existing sample size.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of sub-DLA metallicities at low redshift, confirming their higher metallicity compared to DLAs, and explores their chemical and dust properties with improved data.
Findings
Sub-DLAs have near-solar or super-solar metallicities.
Sub-DLAs exhibit higher average metallicity than DLAs at all redshifts.
Metallicity measurements from absorption and emission lines are consistent.
Abstract
We report observations of four sub-damped Lyman-alpha (sub-DLA) quasar absorbers at z<0.5 obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope Cosmic Origins Spectrograph. We measure the available neutrals or ions of C, N, O, Si, P, S, Ar, Mn, Fe, and/or Ni. Our data have doubled the sub-DLA metallicity samples at z<0.5 and improved constraints on sub-DLA chemical evolution. All four of our sub-DLAs are consistent with near-solar or super-solar metallicities and relatively modest ionization corrections; observations of more lines and detailed modeling will help to verify this. Combining our data with measurements from the literature, we confirm previous suggestions that the N(HI)-weighted mean metallicity of sub-DLAs exceeds that of DLAs at all redshifts studied, even after making ionization corrections for sub-DLAs. The absorber toward PHL 1598 shows significant dust depletion. The absorbers…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
