Ramifications of Optical Pumping on the Interpretation of Time-Resolved Photoemission Experiments on Graphene
S{\o}ren Ulstrup, Jens Christian Johannsen, Federico Cilento, Alberto, Crepaldi, Jill A. Miwa, Michele Zacchigna, Cephise Cacho, Richard T. Chapman,, Emma Springate, Felix Fromm, Christian Raidel, Thomas Seyller, Phil D. C., King, Fulvio Parmigiani, Marco Grioni, Philip Hofmann

TL;DR
This paper investigates how pump-induced effects in time-resolved photoemission experiments on graphene can distort data interpretation, emphasizing the importance of accounting for these effects in experimental analysis.
Contribution
The study reveals the influence of pump-induced artifacts like spectral shifts and double excitations on TR-ARPES data of graphene, highlighting the need for careful data deconvolution.
Findings
Spectral shift and broadening depend on time and laser fluence.
Double pump excitation caused by internal reflections was observed.
Pump-related effects are slower than electron dynamics, enabling signal deconvolution.
Abstract
In pump-probe time and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (TR-ARPES) experiments the presence of the pump pulse adds a new level of complexity to the photoemission process in comparison to conventional ARPES. This is evidenced by pump-induced vacuum space-charge effects and surface photovoltages, as well as multiple pump excitations due to internal reflections in the sample-substrate system. These processes can severely affect a correct interpretation of the data by masking the out-of-equilibrium electron dynamics intrinsic to the sample. In this study, we show that such effects indeed influence TR-ARPES data of graphene on a silicon carbide (SiC) substrate. In particular, we find a time- and laser fluence-dependent spectral shift and broadening of the acquired spectra, and unambiguously show the presence of a double pump excitation. The dynamics of these effects is slower than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
