Counterexamples to a conjecture of Balasubramanian and Parthasarathy
Shunyi Liu

TL;DR
This paper provides counterexamples to a longstanding conjecture by Balasubramanian and Parthasarathy that the bivariate permanent polynomial uniquely characterizes graphs, showing that different graphs can share the same polynomial.
Contribution
The paper presents the first known counterexamples disproving the conjecture that the bivariate permanent polynomial is a graph characterizing polynomial.
Findings
Counterexamples exist where non-isomorphic graphs share the same bivariate permanent polynomial
The conjecture by Balasubramanian and Parthasarathy is false
Graph polynomials may not always uniquely identify graph isomorphism
Abstract
In 1980, Balasubramanian and Parthasarathy introduced the bivariate permanent polynomials of graphs and conjectured that this graph polynomial is a graph characterising polynomial, that is, any two graphs with the same bivariate permanent polynomial are isomorphic. In this note, we give counter examples to this conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Graph theory and applications · Advanced Graph Theory Research
