Planck 2015 results. XIX. Constraints on primordial magnetic fields
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja,, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy,, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock

TL;DR
This paper uses Planck 2015 data to place stringent constraints on the strength and properties of primordial magnetic fields through various CMB anisotropy effects, including spectra, polarization, non-Gaussianities, and isotropy breaking.
Contribution
It provides the most comprehensive set of constraints on primordial magnetic fields by analyzing multiple CMB signatures with Planck data, including new limits on field amplitude and helicity.
Findings
PMFs are constrained to less than a few nanogauss.
No significant evidence for Alfvén waves was found.
Different methods yield consistent upper limits on PMF strength.
Abstract
We compute and investigate four types of imprint of a stochastic background of primordial magnetic fields (PMFs) on the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies: the impact of PMFs on the CMB spectra; the effect on CMB polarization induced by Faraday rotation; the impact of PMFs on the ionization history; magnetically-induced non-Gaussianities; and the magnetically-induced breaking of statistical isotropy. Overall, Planck data constrain the amplitude of PMFs to less than a few nanogauss. In particular, individual limits coming from the analysis of the CMB angular power spectra, using the Planck likelihood, are nG (where is the comoving field amplitude at a scale of 1 Mpc) at 95% confidence level, assuming zero helicity, and nG for a maximally helical field.For nearly scale-invariant PMFs we obtain…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
