Planck 2015 results. XVIII. Background geometry & topology
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S., Basak, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard,, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi

TL;DR
This paper uses Planck 2015 CMB data to search for signs of non-trivial topology and anisotropic cosmologies, finding no evidence for such features and setting limits on their possible scales.
Contribution
First polarization-based search for topology with Planck data, providing new constraints on the size of possible universe topologies and anisotropic models.
Findings
No detection of compact topology below the last scattering surface scale.
Limits on the inscribed sphere radius: R_i>0.97χ_rec for cubic torus.
No evidence supporting Bianchi VII_h cosmology when fitting parameters simultaneously.
Abstract
Full-sky CMB maps from the 2015 Planck release allow us to detect departures from global isotropy on the largest scales. We present the first searches using CMB polarization for correlations induced by a non-trivial topology with a fundamental domain intersecting, or nearly intersecting, the last scattering surface (at comoving distance ). We specialize to flat spaces with toroidal and slab topologies, finding that explicit searches for the latter are sensitive to other topologies with antipodal symmetry. These searches yield no detection of a compact topology at a scale below the diameter of the last scattering surface. The limits on the radius of the largest sphere inscribed in the topological domain (at log-likelihood-ratio relative to a simply-connected flat Planck best-fit model) are for the cubic torus and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
