Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown,, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N., Bartolo, E. Battaner, R. Battye, K. Benabed, A. Benoit, A. Benoit-Levy, J.-P., Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J. J. Bock

TL;DR
The Planck 2015 results provide precise measurements of cosmological parameters within the LCDM model, confirming its consistency with various astrophysical data and constraining key parameters like Hubble constant, matter density, and neutrino masses.
Contribution
This paper presents the most comprehensive analysis of Planck 2015 CMB data, refining cosmological parameters and testing extensions beyond the standard model.
Findings
Consistent with six-parameter LCDM cosmology
Hubble constant measured as 67.8 km/s/Mpc
Neutrino mass sum constrained to < 0.23 eV
Abstract
We present results based on full-mission Planck observations of temperature and polarization anisotropies of the CMB. These data are consistent with the six-parameter inflationary LCDM cosmology. From the Planck temperature and lensing data, for this cosmology we find a Hubble constant, H0= (67.8 +/- 0.9) km/s/Mpc, a matter density parameter Omega_m = 0.308 +/- 0.012 and a scalar spectral index with n_s = 0.968 +/- 0.006. (We quote 68% errors on measured parameters and 95% limits on other parameters.) Combined with Planck temperature and lensing data, Planck LFI polarization measurements lead to a reionization optical depth of tau = 0.066 +/- 0.016. Combining Planck with other astrophysical data we find N_ eff = 3.15 +/- 0.23 for the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom and the sum of neutrino masses is constrained to < 0.23 eV. Spatial curvature is found to be |Omega_K|…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
