Planck 2015 results. IV. Low Frequency Instrument beams and window functions
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont,, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, E. Battaner, K., Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P., Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond

TL;DR
This paper details the in-flight beam characterization and window function estimation for the Planck LFI, improving polarization analysis accuracy with precise measurements and uncertainty assessments.
Contribution
It provides updated in-flight beam profiles, improved window functions, and a comprehensive uncertainty analysis for the Planck LFI, enhancing polarization data accuracy.
Findings
Beam measurements agree with simulations within 1%
Uncertainties in window functions are below 1% at key frequencies
Main beam profiles are characterized down to -25 to -30 dB
Abstract
This paper presents the characterization of the in-flight beams, the beam window functions, and the associated uncertainties for the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI). The structure of the paper is similar to that presented in the 2013 Planck release; the main differences concern the beam normalization and the delivery of the window functions to be used for polarization analysis. The in-flight assessment of the LFI main beams relies on measurements performed during observations of Jupiter. By stacking data from seven Jupiter transits, the main beam profiles are measured down to -25 dB at 30 and 44 GHz, and down to -30 dB at 70 GHz. It has been confirmed that the agreement between the simulated beams and the measured beams is better than 1% at each LFI frequency band (within the 20 dB contour from the peak, the rms values are 0.1% at 30 and 70 GHz; 0.2% at 44 GHz). Simulated…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
