The Lebesgue Universal Covering Problem
John C. Baez, Karine Bagdasaryan, Philip Gibbs

TL;DR
This paper improves the known minimal area of a convex universal covering for sets of diameter 1, reducing the previous best by a significant margin through refined geometric analysis.
Contribution
It presents a new, smaller universal covering with an area less than 0.8441153, refining previous results and correcting earlier claims about the area removed.
Findings
New universal covering with area < 0.8441153
Corrects previous area removal estimate of Hansen
Reduces the minimal area by approximately 2.2e-5
Abstract
In 1914 Lebesgue defined a "universal covering" to be a convex subset of the plane that contains an isometric copy of any subset of diameter 1. His challenge of finding a universal covering with the least possible area has been addressed by various mathematicians: Pal, Sprague and Hansen have each created a smaller universal covering by removing regions from those known before. However, Hansen's last reduction was microsopic: he claimed to remove an area of , but we show that he actually removed an area of just . In the following, with the help of Greg Egan, we find a new, smaller universal covering with area less than . This reduces the area of the previous best universal covering by a whopping .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory · Mathematics and Applications
