Evaluating epoetin dosing strategies using observational longitudinal data
Cecilia A. Cotton, Patrick J. Heagerty

TL;DR
This paper develops a methodology for comparing different epoetin dosing strategies on survival outcomes using observational longitudinal data, addressing challenges of nonadherence and multiple treatment regimens.
Contribution
It introduces a cloning strategy and inverse probability weighted tests to evaluate dynamic treatment regimens in observational studies.
Findings
Method effectively compares survival under different dosing regimens.
Simulation studies validate the approach.
Application to US dialysis data illustrates practical utility.
Abstract
Epoetin is commonly used to treat anemia in chronic kidney disease and End Stage Renal Disease subjects undergoing dialysis, however, there is considerable uncertainty about what level of hemoglobin or hematocrit should be targeted in these subjects. In order to address this question, we treat epoetin dosing guidelines as a type of dynamic treatment regimen. Specifically, we present a methodology for comparing the effects of alternative treatment regimens on survival using observational data. In randomized trials patients can be assigned to follow a specific management guideline, but in observational studies subjects can have treatment paths that appear to be adherent to multiple regimens at the same time. We present a cloning strategy in which each subject contributes follow-up data to each treatment regimen to which they are continuously adherent and artificially censored at first…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
