A Joint Analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck Data
BICEP2/Keck, Planck Collaborations: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, Z., Ahmed, R. W. Aikin, K. D. Alexander, M. Arnaud, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A., J. Banday, D. Barkats, R. B. Barreiro, J. G. Bartlett, N. Bartolo, E., Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A. Benoit-L\'evy

TL;DR
This paper combines BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck data to analyze polarization signals, finding strong evidence for dust contamination and setting an upper limit on primordial gravitational waves, with lensing B-modes detected at high significance.
Contribution
It provides the first joint analysis of BICEP2/Keck and Planck polarization data, constraining the tensor-to-scalar ratio and dust contribution with improved methods.
Findings
No significant evidence for primordial tensor modes.
Upper limit on tensor-to-scalar ratio r < 0.12 at 95% confidence.
Lensing B-modes detected at 7.0 sigma significance.
Abstract
We report the results of a joint analysis of data from BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck. BICEP2 and Keck Array have observed the same approximately 400 deg patch of sky centered on RA 0h, Dec. . The combined maps reach a depth of 57 nK deg in Stokes and in a band centered at 150 GHz. Planck has observed the full sky in polarization at seven frequencies from 30 to 353 GHz, but much less deeply in any given region (1.2 K deg in and at 143 GHz). We detect 150353 cross-correlation in -modes at high significance. We fit the single- and cross-frequency power spectra at frequencies GHz to a lensed-CDM model that includes dust and a possible contribution from inflationary gravitational waves (as parameterized by the tensor-to-scalar ratio ), using a prior on the frequency spectral behavior of polarized dust emission from previous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
