No hyperbolic pants for the 4-body problem
Connor Jackman, Richard Montgomery

TL;DR
This paper investigates the geometric properties of the equal mass 4-body problem with a 1/r^2 potential, showing that its associated metric does not maintain negative curvature, unlike the 3-body case, thus challenging extensions of hyperbolic behavior.
Contribution
It proves that the Riemannian metric for the equal mass 4-body problem does not have negative curvature everywhere, disproving the extension of hyperbolic properties from the 3-body case.
Findings
The 4-body problem metric has positive sectional curvature at some planes.
Negative curvature does not extend from 3-body to 4-body problem.
Naive hyperbolicity extension from N=3 to N>3 is not valid.
Abstract
The -body problem with a potential has, in addition to translation and rotational symmetry, an effective scale symmetry which allows its zero energy flow to be reduced to a geodesic flow on complex projective -space, minus a hyperplane arrangement. When we get a geodesic flow on the two-sphere minus three points. If, in addition we assume that the three masses are equal, then it was proved in [1] that the corresponding metric is hyperbolic: its Gaussian curvature is negative except at two points. Does the negative curvature property persist for , that is, in the equal mass 4-body problem? Here we prove `no' by computing that the corresponding Riemannian metric in this case has positive sectional curvature at some two-planes. This `no' answer dashes hopes of naively extending hyperbolicity from to .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear physics research studies · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
