Criticality of mostly informative samples: A Bayesian model selection approach
Ariel Haimovici, Matteo Marsili

TL;DR
This paper presents a Bayesian model selection approach to high-dimensional data, revealing that only certain partitions of observed states are distinguishable with limited samples, and that criticality relates to the relevance of state representations rather than self-organization.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework to distinguish between resolution and relevance in state representations, linking criticality to the relevance of samples without assuming self-organization.
Findings
Most relevant samples follow power law distributions.
Relevance of state partitions varies non-monotonically with resolution.
Criticality reflects state relevance, not self-organization.
Abstract
We discuss a Bayesian model selection approach to high dimensional data in the deep under sampling regime. The data is based on a representation of the possible discrete states , as defined by the observer, and it consists of observations of the state. This approach shows that, for a given sample size , not all states observed in the sample can be distinguished. Rather, only a partition of the sampled states can be resolved. Such partition defines an {\em emergent} classification of the states that becomes finer and finer as the sample size increases, through a process of {\em symmetry breaking} between states. This allows us to distinguish between the of a given representation of the observer defined states , which is given by the entropy of , and its which is defined by the entropy of the partition . Relevance has a non-monotonic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
