An in-between "implicit" and "explicit" complexity: Automata
Cl\'ement Aubert (LACL)

TL;DR
This paper surveys how automata theory has contributed to implicit computational complexity by providing machine-dependent models with implicit bounds, focusing on the interplay between automata and complexity measures.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive overview of automata-based approaches to implicit computational complexity, highlighting their role in internalizing complexity bounds.
Findings
Automata theory provides machine-dependent models with implicit bounds.
Automata contribute to internalizing complexity measures.
Survey clarifies automata's role in implicit computational complexity.
Abstract
Implicit Computational Complexity makes two aspects implicit, by manipulating programming languages rather than models of com-putation, and by internalizing the bounds rather than using external measure. We survey how automata theory contributed to complexity with a machine-dependant with implicit bounds model.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · semigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
