
TL;DR
This paper studies a class of graphs called abelian spiders, showing only finitely many such graphs are non-Dynkin and abelian, with implications for classifying subfactors and Salem numbers.
Contribution
It generalizes previous work by classifying abelian spider graphs and establishing their finiteness and enumerability, with applications to subfactor theory.
Findings
Finitely many abelian spiders are not Dynkin diagrams.
All such spiders can be effectively enumerated.
The set of Salem numbers of abelian type is discrete.
Abstract
If G is a finite graph, then the largest eigenvalue L of the adjacency matrix of G is a totally real algebraic integer (L is the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue of G). We say that G is abelian if the field generated by L^2 is abelian. Given a fixed graph G and a fixed set of vertices of G, we define a spider graph to be a graph obtained by attaching to each of the chosen vertices of G some 2-valent trees of finite length. The main result is that only finitely many of the corresponding spider graphs are both abelian and not Dynkin diagrams, and that all such spiders can be effectively enumerated; this generalizes a previous result of Calegari, Morrison, and Snyder. The main theorem has applications to the classification of finite index subfactors. We also prove that the set of Salem numbers of "abelian type" is discrete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications
