Connecting Faint End Slopes of the Lyman-$\alpha$ emitter and Lyman-break Galaxy Luminosity Functions
Max Gronke, Mark Dijkstra, Michele Trenti, Stuart Wyithe

TL;DR
This paper models the Ly$ ext{α}$ luminosity functions of high-redshift galaxies, revealing a steeper faint-end slope than UV-LFs and predicting a potential turn-over that informs the understanding of the Epoch of Reionization.
Contribution
It introduces a phenomenological model linking Ly$ ext{α}$ and UV luminosity functions, predicting their shapes and faint-end behaviors at $z=3-6$, and discusses implications for reionization.
Findings
Ly$ ext{α}$ LFs are well-described by Schechter functions over certain luminosities.
The faint-end slope of Ly$ ext{α}$ LFs is steeper than UV-LFs, especially at $z ightarrow 4$.
A turn-over in Ly$ ext{α}$ LF may indicate flattening of UV-LF at specific magnitudes.
Abstract
We predict Lyman- (Ly) luminosity functions (LFs) of Ly-selected galaxies (Ly emitters, or LAEs) at using the phenomenological model of Dijkstra & Wyithe (2012). This model combines observed UV-LFs of Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs, or drop out galaxies), with constraints on their distribution of Ly line strengths as a function of UV-luminosity and redshift. Our analysis shows that while Ly LFs of LAEs are generally not Schechter functions, these provide a good description over the luminosity range of . Motivated by this result, we predict Schechter function parameters at . Our analysis further shows that (i) the faint end slope of the Ly LF is steeper than that of the UV-LF of Lyman-break galaxies, (with a median at ), and (ii)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
