LOSS's First Supernova? New Limits on the "Impostor" SN 1997bs
Scott M. Adams, C.S. Kochanek

TL;DR
This study uses late-time space telescope observations to investigate whether SN 1997bs was a supernova or an impostor, finding it remains faint and challenging the dust-obscuration models, with the most likely explanation being a subluminous supernova.
Contribution
It provides new late-time observational data of SN 1997bs, challenging existing dust-obscuration models and suggesting it was likely a subluminous Type IIn supernova.
Findings
SN 1997bs remains much fainter than its progenitor.
Dust obscuration models are disfavored.
A subluminous Type IIn SN is the most plausible explanation.
Abstract
We present new, late-time Hubble Space Telescope and Spitzer Space Telescope observations of the archetypal supernova (SN) impostor SN 1997bs. We show that SN 1997bs remains much fainter than its progenitor, posing a challenge for the canonical picture of late-time obscuration by dust forming in a shell ejected during the transient. The possibility that the star survived cloaked behind a dusty, steady wind is also disfavored. The simplest explanation is that SN 1997bs was a subluminous Type IIn SN, although it is currently impossible to rule out the possibility that the star survived either behind an obscuring dusty shell or with a significantly decreased intrinsic luminosity. Continued monitoring of the system is the most promising means of ultimately resolving the question.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
