Modeling atmospheric emission for CMB ground-based observations
J. Errard, P.A.R. Ade, Y. Akiba, K. Arnold, M. Atlas, C. Baccigalupi,, D. Barron, D. Boettger, J. Borrill, S. Chapman, Y. Chinone, A. Cukierman, J., Delabrouille, M. Dobbs, A. Ducout, T. Elleflot, G. Fabbian, C. Feng, S., Feeney, A. Gilbert, N. Goeckner-Wald, N.W. Halverson

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive 3D atmospheric emission model for ground-based CMB observations, enabling better understanding and simulation of atmospheric noise effects on detector data.
Contribution
It presents a new physically motivated 3D model of atmospheric emission, analytical estimates of detector correlations, and validation using POLARBEAR-I data, improving noise modeling for CMB experiments.
Findings
Derived a 1.0% upper limit on atmospheric polarization fraction.
Validated the model with POLARBEAR-I data.
Compared results with previous studies and weather data.
Abstract
Atmosphere is one of the most important noise sources for ground-based cosmic microwave background (CMB) experiments. By increasing optical loading on the detectors, it amplifies their effective noise, while its fluctuations introduce spatial and temporal correlations between detected signals. We present a physically motivated 3d-model of the atmosphere total intensity emission in the millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths. We derive a new analytical estimate for the correlation between detectors time-ordered data as a function of the instrument and survey design, as well as several atmospheric parameters such as wind, relative humidity, temperature and turbulence characteristics. Using an original numerical computation, we examine the effect of each physical parameter on the correlations in the time series of a given experiment. We then use a parametric-likelihood approach to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
