Nanotechnology: a slightly different history
Peter Schulz

TL;DR
This paper explores the often overlooked historical origins of nanotechnology, emphasizing the importance of understanding its development and cultural significance beyond simplified narratives.
Contribution
It provides a nuanced historical analysis of nanotechnology's origins, challenging common simplified timelines and highlighting its multidisciplinary and cultural aspects.
Findings
Historical narratives often omit key origins of nanotechnology
Understanding nanotechnology's history aids in its dissemination and cultural integration
The field's development is more complex and multidisciplinary than commonly portrayed
Abstract
Many introductory articles and books about nanotechnology have been written to disseminate this apparently new technology, which investigate and manipulates matter at dimension of a billionth of a meter. However, these texts show in general a common feature: there is very little about the origins of this multidisciplinary field. If anything is mentioned at all, a few dates, facts and characters are reinforced, which under the scrutiny of a careful historical digging do not sustain as really founding landmarks of the field. Nevertheless, in spite of these flaws, such historical narratives bring up important elements to understand and contextualize this human endeavor, as well as the corresponding dissemination among the public: would nanotechnology be a cultural imperative?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNanotechnology research and applications
