A method to discriminate solar and antisolar differential rotation in high-precision light curves

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new method to determine whether stars exhibit solar-like or antisolar differential rotation by analyzing high-precision light curves and harmonic peak ratios, aiding understanding of stellar magnetic activity.

Contribution

The paper presents a novel technique using Lomb-Scargle periodograms and harmonic ratios to identify the sign of stellar differential rotation from light curves.

Findings

Successfully applied to Kepler data, identifying stars with solar-like and antisolar DR.

False-positive rate for antisolar DR detection is at most 20%.

Detected 21-34 stars with solar-like DR and 5-10 with antisolar DR.

Abstract

Surface differential rotation (DR) is one major ingredient of the magnetic field generation process in the Sun and likely in other stars. The term solar-like differential rotation describes the observation that solar equatorial regions rotate faster than polar ones. The opposite effect of polar regions rotating faster than equatorial ones (termed as antisolar DR) has only been observed in a few stars, although there is evidence from theoretical dynamo models. We present a new method to detect the sign of DR (i.e. solar-like or antisolar DR) by analyzing long-term high-precision light curves with the Lomb-Scargle periodogram.We compute the Lomb-Scargle periodogram and identify a set of significant periods $P_k$, which we associate with active regions located at different latitudes on the the stellar surface. If detectable, the first harmonics ($P_k'$) of these periods were identified to compute their peak-height-ratios $r_k:=h(P_k')/h(P_k)$. Spots rotating at lower latitudes generate less sine-shaped light curves, which requires additional power in the harmonics, and results in larger ratios $r_k$. Comparing different ratios $r_k$ and the associated periods $P_k$ yields information about the spot latitudes, and reveals the sign of DR. We tested our method on different sets of synthetic light curves all exhibiting solar-like DR. The number of cases where our method detects antisolar DR is the false-positive rate of our method. Depending on the set of light curves, the noise level, the required minimum peak separation, and the presence or absence of spot evolution, our method fails to detect the correct sign in at most 20%. We applied our method to 50 Kepler G stars and found 21-34 stars with solar-like DR and 5-10 stars with antisolar DR, depending on the minimum peak separation.