Mapping the average AGN accretion rate in the SFR-M* plane for Herschel selected galaxies at 0<z<2.5
I. Delvecchio, D. Lutz, S. Berta, D. J. Rosario, G. Zamorani, F., Pozzi, C. Gruppioni, C. Vignali, M. Brusa, A. Cimatti, D. L. Clements, A., Cooray, D. Farrah, G. Lanzuisi, S. Oliver, G. Rodighiero, P. Santini, M., Symeonidis

TL;DR
This study investigates the relationship between AGN accretion rates, star formation, and stellar mass in Herschel-selected galaxies up to redshift 2.5, revealing correlations that suggest linked growth of black holes and galaxies.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed mapping of average AGN accretion rates across the SFR-M* plane for a large, Herschel-selected galaxy sample up to z=2.5, accounting for AGN emission in SEDs.
Findings
Average AGN accretion correlates with SFR and M*.
Dependence on SFR becomes more significant at z>0.8.
AGN accretion and star formation increase similarly with offset from the main sequence.
Abstract
We study the relation of AGN accretion, star formation rate (SFR), and stellar mass (M) using a sample of 8600 star-forming galaxies up to z=2.5 selected with \textit{Herschel} imaging in the GOODS and COSMOS fields. For each of them we derive SFR and M, both corrected, when necessary, for emission from an active galactic nucleus (AGN), through the decomposition of their spectral energy distributions (SEDs). About 10 per cent of the sample are detected individually in \textit{Chandra} observations of the fields. For the rest of the sample we stack the X-ray maps to get average X-ray properties. After subtracting the X-ray luminosity expected from star formation and correcting for nuclear obscuration, we derive the average AGN accretion rate for both detected sources and stacks, as a function of M, SFR and redshift. The average accretion rate correlates with SFR…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
