The power of low-resolution spectroscopy: On the spectral classification of planet candidates in the ground-based CoRoT follow-up
M. Ammler-von Eiff, D. Sebastian, E.W. Guenther, B. Stecklum, and J., Cabrera

TL;DR
This study evaluates how low-resolution spectroscopy can effectively classify CoRoT planet candidates, demonstrating its potential to distinguish giants from dwarfs and improve candidate selection despite SNR limitations.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness and limitations of low-resolution spectroscopy for spectral classification of exoplanet candidates, including the impact of SNR.
Findings
Spectral classification agrees within a few subclasses at SNR ≥ 100.
Photometric and spectroscopic classifications are comparable at high SNR.
Low SNR significantly limits classification accuracy, but spectroscopy still aids candidate vetting.
Abstract
Planetary transits detected by the CoRoT mission can be mimicked by a low-mass star in orbit around a giant star. Spectral classification helps to identify the giant stars and also early-type stars which are often excluded from further follow-up. We study the potential and the limitations of low-resolution spectroscopy to improve the photometric spectral types of CoRoT candidates. In particular, we want to study the influence of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the target spectrum in a quantitative way. We built an own template library and investigate whether a template library from the literature is able to reproduce the classifications. Including previous photometric estimates, we show how the additional spectroscopic information improves the constraints on spectral type. Low-resolution spectroscopy (1000) of 42 CoRoT targets covering a wide range in SNR (1-437) and of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
