Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler V: Planet Sample from Q1-Q12 (36 Months)
Jason F. Rowe, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Victoria Antoci, Thomas Barclay,, Natalie M. Batalha, William J. Borucki, Christopher J. Burke, Steven T., Bryson, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jennifer R. Campbell, Joseph H. Catanzarite,, Jessie L. Christiansen, William Cochran, Ronald L. Gilliland

TL;DR
This paper updates the Kepler exoplanet candidate catalog with 3 years of data, identifying 855 new candidates, refining parameters, and discussing false positives to improve candidate reliability.
Contribution
It provides an expanded and refined catalog of Kepler planetary candidates based on 3 years of data, including new candidates and improved transit parameters.
Findings
Total candidates increased to 3697.
Approximately 130 candidates are Earth-like in flux and size.
A dozen candidates meet criteria for Earth analogs.
Abstract
The Kepler mission discovered 2842 exoplanet candidates with 2 years of data. We provide updates to the Kepler planet candidate sample based upon 3 years (Q1-Q12) of data. Through a series of tests to exclude false-positives, primarily caused by eclipsing binary stars and instrumental systematics, 855 additional planetary candidates have been discovered, bringing the total number known to 3697. We provide revised transit parameters and accompanying posterior distributions based on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for the cumulative catalogue of Kepler Objects of Interest. There are now 130 candidates in the cumulative catalogue that receive less than twice the flux the Earth receives and more than 1100 have a radius less than 1.5 Rearth. There are now a dozen candidates meeting both criteria, roughly doubling the number of candidate Earth analogs. A majority of planetary candidates…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
