Exploring approximations to the GW self-energy ionic gradients
C. Faber (NEEL), P. Boulanger (NEEL), C. Attaccalite (NEEL), E., Cannuccia (Institut Laue), I. Duchemin (INAC), T. Deutsch (INAC), X. Blase, (NEEL)

TL;DR
This paper compares different approximations within the GW formalism for calculating electron-phonon interactions, finding that a constant screening approach offers a good balance of accuracy and computational efficiency for practical applications.
Contribution
It introduces and validates a simplified constant screening approximation for GW-based electron-phonon coupling calculations, reducing computational costs.
Findings
The constant screening approach is the most reliable among tested approximations.
Static COHSEX approximation leads to significant errors.
Validated on diamond, graphene, and C60 fullerene.
Abstract
The accuracy of the many-body perturbation theory GW formalism to calculate electron-phonon coupling matrix elements has been recently demonstrated in the case of a few important systems. However, the related computational costs are high and thus represent strong limitations to its widespread application. In the present study, we explore two less demanding alternatives for the calculation of electron-phonon coupling matrix elements on the many-body perturbation theory level. Namely, we test the accuracy of the static Coulomb-hole plus screened-exchange (COHSEX) approximation and further of the constant screening approach, where variations of the screened Coulomb potential W upon small changes of the atomic positions along the vibrational eigenmodes are neglected. We find this latter approximation to be the most reliable, whereas the static COHSEX ansatz leads to substantial errors. Our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
