The nature of the [CII] emission in dusty star-forming galaxies from the SPT survey
Bitten Gullberg (ESO), Carlos De Breuck (ESO), Joaquin Vieira, (Illinois), Axel Weiss (MPIfR), James Aguirre (University of Pennsylvania),, Manuel Aravena (Universidad Diego Portales), Matthieu B\'ethermin (ESO), C., Matt Bradford (JPL), Matt Bothwell (Cambridge)

TL;DR
This study investigates the [CII] emission in 20 dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift, revealing consistent velocity profiles with CO lines and constraining interstellar medium properties through line ratios.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of [CII] emission in a large, lensed high-redshift galaxy sample, linking [CII], CO, and FIR data to ISM conditions.
Findings
[CII] to CO(1-0) luminosity ratio of 5200 +- 1800
Little differential lensing between [CII] and CO lines
High [CII] excitation temperature and optical depth conditions
Abstract
We present [CII] observations of 20 strongly lensed dusty star forming galaxies at 2.1 < z < 5.7 using APEX and Herschel. The sources were selected on their 1.4 mm flux (S_1.4mm > 20 mJy) from the South Pole Telescope survey, with far-infrared (FIR) luminosities determined from extensive photometric data. The [CII] line is robustly detected in 17 sources, all but one being spectrally resolved. Eleven out of 20 sources observed in [CII] also have low-J CO detections from ATCA. A comparison with mid- and high-J CO lines from ALMA reveals consistent [CII] and CO velocity profiles, suggesting that there is little differential lensing between these species. The [CII], low-J CO and FIR data allow us to constrain the properties of the interstellar medium. We find [CII] to CO(1-0) luminosity ratios in the SPT sample of 5200 +- 1800, with significantly less scatter than in other samples. This…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
