Comment on "Human Time-Frequency Acuity Beats the Fourier Uncertainty Principle"
G.S. Thekkadath, Michael Spanner

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous claim that human hearing can surpass the Fourier uncertainty principle, arguing that the experimental design was inappropriate for testing this principle.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that the original experiment was ill-suited to evaluate Fourier uncertainty in human auditory perception.
Findings
Original experiment was ill-designed for testing Fourier uncertainty
Human hearing does not necessarily beat the Fourier uncertainty principle
Highlights importance of proper experimental design in perceptual studies
Abstract
In the initial article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 044301 (2013), arXiv:1208.4611] it was claimed that human hearing can beat the Fourier uncertainty principle. In this Comment, we demonstrate that the experiment designed and implemented in the original article was ill-chosen to test Fourier uncertainty in human hearing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
