Algebraic structure of the two-qubit quantum Rabi model and its solvability using Bogoliubov operators
Jie Peng, Zhongzhou Ren, Haitao Yang, Guangjie Guo, Xin Zhang, Guoxing, Ju, Xiaoyong Guo, Chaosheng Deng, Guolin Hao

TL;DR
This paper uncovers the algebraic structure of the two-qubit quantum Rabi model, enabling quasi-exact solutions with finite photons and providing an analytical approach using Bogoliubov operators that clarifies the model's eigenvalues and solutions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel algebraic framework for the two-qubit quantum Rabi model and derives its solutions analytically with Bogoliubov operators, avoiding the need for Bargmann space.
Findings
Existence of quasi-exact eigenstates with at most one photon across all coupling regimes.
Identification of dark states similar to those in the Jaynes-Cummings model.
Analytical retrieval of the model's eigenvalues using convergent power series.
Abstract
We have found the algebraic structure of the two-qubit quantum Rabi model behind the possibility of its novel quasi-exact solutions with finite photon numbers by analyzing the Hamiltonian in the photon number space. The quasi-exact eigenstates with at most photon exist in the whole qubit-photon coupling regime with constant eigenenergy equal to single photon energy \hbar\omega, which can be clear demonstrated from the Hamiltonian structure. With similar method, we find these special "dark states"-like eigenstates commonly exist for the two-qubit Jaynes-Cummings model, with (N=-1,0,1,...), and one of them is also the eigenstate of the two-qubit quantum Rabi model, which may provide some interesting application in a simper way. Besides, using Bogoliubov operators, we analytically retrieve the solution of the general two-qubit quantum Rabi model. In this more concise…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
