Omitting types in operator systems
Isaac Goldbring, Thomas Sinclair

TL;DR
This paper explores the definability and extension properties of operator systems and C*-algebras, revealing limitations of uniform definability, establishing equivalences of key properties, and connecting these to the Kirchberg Embedding Problem.
Contribution
It demonstrates that 1-exact operator systems are not uniformly definable, links WEP to existential closedness, and introduces a new space related to the Kirchberg Embedding Problem.
Findings
1-exact operator systems are not uniformly definable by types
WEP is equivalent to existential closedness and the complete tight Riesz interpolation property
A new space of operator systems relates to the Kirchberg Embedding Problem
Abstract
We show that the class of 1-exact operator systems is not uniformly definable by a sequence of types. We use this fact to show that there is no finitary version of Arveson's extension theorem. Next, we show that WEP is equivalent to a certain notion of existential closedness for C algebras and use this equivalence to give a simpler proof of Kavruk's result that WEP is equivalent to the complete tight Riesz interpolation property. We then introduce a variant of the space of n-dimensional operator systems and connect this new space to the Kirchberg Embedding Problem, which asks whether every C algebra embeds into an ultrapower of the Cuntz algebra . We end with some results concerning the question of whether or not the local lifting property (in the sense of Kirchberg) is uniformly definable by a sequence of types in the language of C algebras.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
