A Reconfigurations Analogue of Brooks' Theorem and its Consequences
Carl Feghali, Matthew Johnson, Dani\"el Paulusma

TL;DR
This paper extends Brooks' Theorem to graph recoloring, showing that from any k-coloring with k > Δ, a Δ-coloring can be reached through a polynomial number of recolorings unless the graph is a complete graph or an odd cycle, with implications for the structure of the reconfiguration graph.
Contribution
It proves an analogue of Brooks' Theorem for recoloring sequences and analyzes the structure and diameter of the reconfiguration graph for bounded degree graphs.
Findings
Any k > Δ coloring can be transformed into a Δ-coloring with O(n^2) recolorings, barring specific graph classes.
The reconfiguration graph R_{Δ+1}(G) has at most two components, with one possibly having diameter O(n^2).
The results classify the complexity and structure of graph recoloring for graphs with bounded maximum degree.
Abstract
Let be a simple undirected graph on vertices with maximum degree~. Brooks' Theorem states that has a -colouring unless~ is a complete graph, or a cycle with an odd number of vertices. To recolour is to obtain a new proper colouring by changing the colour of one vertex. We show an analogue of Brooks' Theorem by proving that from any -colouring, , a -colouring of can be obtained by a sequence of recolourings using only the original colours unless is a complete graph or a cycle with an odd number of vertices, or , is -regular and, for each vertex in , no two neighbours of are coloured alike. We use this result to study the reconfiguration graph of the -colourings of . The vertex set of is the set of all possible -colourings of and two colourings…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
