Predicting alpha Comae Berenices Time of Eclipse II: How 3 Faulty Measurements Out of 609 Caused A 26 Year Binary's Eclipse To Be Missed
Matthew W. Muterspaugh, M.J.P. Wijngaarden, H.F. Henrichs, Benjamin F., Lane, William I. Hartkopf, Gregory W. Henry

TL;DR
This paper investigates how three erroneous historical measurements significantly impacted the prediction of an eclipse in a 26-year binary star system, leading to a missed eclipse event.
Contribution
It identifies the influence of faulty data on orbital modeling and emphasizes the importance of data accuracy in eclipse predictions.
Findings
Three incorrect measurements skewed the orbital model.
The actual eclipse likely occurred two months earlier than predicted.
Data errors caused the eclipse to be missed due to observational timing.
Abstract
The dwarf stars in the 26 year period binary alpha Com were predicted to eclipse each other in early 2015. That prediction was based on an orbit model made with over 600 astrometric observations using micrometers, speckle interferometry, and long baseline optical interferometry. Unfortunately, it has been realized recently that the position angle measurements for three of the observations from ~100 years ago were in error by 180 degrees, which skewed the orbital fit. The eclipse was likely 2 months earlier than predicted, at which point the system was low on the horizon at sunrise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
