Maximin Safety: When Failing to Lose is Preferable to Trying to Win
Brad Gulko, Samantha Leung

TL;DR
This paper introduces maximin safety, a decision rule prioritizing avoiding worst outcomes, explaining certain behavioral effects and providing a normative framework similar to minimax regret.
Contribution
It proposes maximin safety as a novel decision rule, with axiomatic foundations and behavioral explanations, expanding understanding of decision-making strategies.
Findings
Maximin safety explains the decoy effect in preferences.
Maximin safety shares behavioral foundations with minimax regret.
Provides an axiomatic characterization of maximin safety preferences.
Abstract
We present a new decision rule, \emph{maximin safety}, that seeks to maintain a large margin from the worst outcome, in much the same way minimax regret seeks to minimize distance from the best. We argue that maximin safety is valuable both descriptively and normatively. Descriptively, maximin safety explains the well-known \emph{decoy effect}, in which the introduction of a dominated option changes preferences among the other options. Normatively, we provide an axiomatization that characterizes preferences induced by maximin safety, and show that maximin safety shares much of the same behavioral basis with minimax regret.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Economic and Environmental Valuation
