Biases in the inferred mass-to-light ratio of globular clusters: no need for variations in the stellar mass function
Rosemary L. Shanahan (1), Mark Gieles (2) ((1) Edinburgh, (2), Surrey)

TL;DR
This study shows that biases in dynamical mass estimates of globular clusters, caused by assumptions about mass segregation and mass function, explain observed discrepancies without needing IMF variations.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that biases from mass segregation and mass function flattening account for mass-to-light ratio discrepancies, negating the need for IMF variations.
Findings
Bias in inferred mass increases with metallicity.
Mass segregation and mass function flattening have opposing effects.
Kinematical data can constrain black hole populations in GCs.
Abstract
From a study of the integrated light properties of 200 globular clusters (GCs) in M31, Strader et al. found that the mass-to-light ratios are lower than what is expected from simple stellar population (SSP) models with a `canonical' stellar initial mass function (IMF), with the discrepancy being larger at high metallicities. We use dynamical multi-mass models, that include a prescription for equipartition, to quantify the bias in the inferred dynamical mass as the result of the assumption that light follows mass. For a universal IMF and a metallicity dependent present day mass function we find that the inferred mass from integrated light properties systematically under estimates the true mass, and that the bias is more important at high metallicities, as was found for the M31 GCs. We show that mass segregation and a flattening of the mass function have opposing effects of similar…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
