Evolution of field line helicity during magnetic reconnection
Alexander J. B. Russell, Anthony R. Yeates, Gunnar Hornig, Antonia, L. Wilmot-Smith

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how field line helicity evolves during magnetic reconnection, revealing that reconnection efficiently redistributes helicity locally without significantly changing the total helicity, using derived evolution equations and kinematic examples.
Contribution
It derives the evolution equation for field line helicity and demonstrates its dominant work-like term during localized reconnection, highlighting efficient local helicity redistribution.
Findings
Reconnection redistributes helicity in a pairwise manner.
The evolution of field line helicity is dominated by a work-like term at endpoints.
Reconnection efficiently redistributes helicity with minimal change to total helicity.
Abstract
We investigate the evolution of field line helicity for magnetic fields that connect two boundaries without null points, with emphasis on localized finite-B magnetic reconnection. Total (relative) magnetic helicity is already recognized as an important topological constraint on magnetohydrodynamic processes. Field line helicity offers further advantages because it preserves all topological information and can distinguish between different magnetic fields with the same total helicity. Magnetic reconnection changes field connectivity and field line helicity reflects these changes; the goal of this paper is to characterize that evolution. We start by deriving the evolution equation for field line helicity and examining its terms, also obtaining a simplified form for cases where dynamics are localized within the domain. The main result, which we support using kinematic examples, is that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
