Curvature and the c-projective mobility of Kaehler metrics with hamiltonian 2-forms
David M.J. Calderbank, Vladimir S. Matveev, Stefan Rosemann

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between curvature, hamiltonian 2-forms, and c-projective mobility in Kähler metrics, providing explicit classifications and necessary conditions for higher mobility.
Contribution
It establishes necessary and sufficient conditions for Kähler metrics to have high c-projective mobility, linking curvature nullity to the existence of hamiltonian 2-forms and classifying such metrics.
Findings
Kähler metrics with high mobility admit hamiltonian 2-forms
Curvature nullity is necessary for mobility ≥ 3
Explicit classification of metrics with mobility ≥ 3
Abstract
The mobility of a Kaehler metric is the dimension of the space of metrics with which it is c-projectively equivalent. The mobility is at least two if and only if the Kaehler metric admits a nontrivial hamiltonian 2-form. After summarizing this relationship, we present necessary conditions for a Kaehler metric to have mobility at least three: its curvature must have nontrivial nullity at every point. Using the local classification of Kaehler metrics with hamiltonian 2-forms, we describe explicitly the Kaehler metrics with mobility at least three and hence show that the nullity condition on the curvature is also sufficient, up to some degenerate exceptions. In an Appendix, we explain how the classification may be related, generically, to the holonomy of a complex cone metric.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
