Noise Robustness of the Incompatibility of Quantum Measurements
Teiko Heinosaari, Jukka Kiukas, Daniel Reitzner

TL;DR
This paper investigates the robustness of quantum measurement incompatibility against noise, introduces measures for quantifying this resource, and explores their implications for quantum nonlocality and Bell inequality violations.
Contribution
It introduces operational incompatibility measures based on noise addition, computes them via semidefinite programming, and links them to Bell inequality violations and Tsirelson's bound.
Findings
Incompatibility measures can be computed efficiently using semidefinite programs.
Maximal violations of scaled CHSH inequalities are characterized, including Tsirelson's bound.
Noise-based incompatibility quantifiers relate directly to quantum nonlocality phenomena.
Abstract
The existence of incompatible measurements is a fundamental phenomenon having no explanation in classical physics. Intuitively, one considers given measurements to be incompatible within a framework of a physical theory, if their simultaneous implementation on a single physical device is prohibited by the theory itself. In the mathematical language of quantum theory, measurements are described by POVMs (positive operator valued measures), and given POVMs are by definition incompatible if they cannot be obtained via coarse-graining from a single common POVM; this notion generalizes noncommutativity of projective measurements. In quantum theory, incompatibility can be regarded as a resource necessary for manifesting phenomena such as Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality violations or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering which do not have classical explanation. We define…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
