Predicting binding free energies in solution
Jan H. Jensen

TL;DR
This paper reviews various factors affecting the accuracy of computational predictions of absolute binding free energies in aqueous solutions, highlighting sources of errors and potential improvements.
Contribution
It summarizes key factors influencing binding free energy calculations and discusses their impact on prediction accuracy in electronic structure theory.
Findings
Multiple factors contribute 1-3 kcal/mol errors at 298 K.
Explicit solvent and conformational sampling are critical for accuracy.
Errors vary across different systems and conditions.
Abstract
Recent predictions of absolute binding free energies of host-guest complexes in aqueous solution using electronic structure theory have been encouraging for some systems, while other systems remain problematic for others. In paper I summarize some of the many factors that could easily contribute 1-3 kcal/mol errors at 298 K: three-body dispersion effects, molecular symmetry, anharmonicity, spurious imaginary frequencies, insufficient conformational sampling, wrong or changing ionization states, errors in the solvation free energy of ions, and explicit solvent (and ion) effects that are not well-represented by continuum models. While I focus on binding free energies in aqueous solution the approach also applies (with minor adjustments) to any free energy difference such as conformational or reaction free energy differences or activation free energies in any solvent.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFree Radicals and Antioxidants · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
