On the relationship between the non-local clustering mechanism and preferential concentration
Andrew D. Bragg, Peter J. Ireland, Lance R. Collins

TL;DR
This paper investigates how non-local clustering mechanisms influence inertial particle clustering in turbulence, showing they can cause clustering in high-strain regions without relying on preferential sampling, validated through DNS data.
Contribution
It clarifies the role of non-local mechanisms in particle clustering, extending understanding beyond the classical centrifuge explanation, especially in regimes where Stokes number is not small.
Findings
Non-local clustering is influenced by, but not dependent on, preferential sampling.
Clustering can occur without preferential concentration in certain flow regimes.
DNS data supports the theoretical analysis of non-local clustering mechanisms.
Abstract
`Preferential concentration' (\emph{Phys. Fluids} \textbf{A3}:1169--78, 1991) refers to the clustering of inertial particles in the high-strain, low-rotation regions of turbulence. The `centrifuge mechanism' of Maxey (\emph{J. Fluid Mech.} \textbf{174}:441--65, 1987) appears to explain this phenomenon. In a recent paper, Bragg \& Collins (\emph{New J. Phys.} \textbf{16}:055013, 2014) showed that the centrifuge mechanism is dominant only in the regime , where is the Stokes number based on the Kolmogorov time scale. Outside this regime, the centrifuge mechanism gives way to a non-local, path-history symmetry breaking mechanism. However, despite the change in the clustering mechanism, the instantaneous particle positions continue to correlate with high-strain, low-rotation regions of the turbulence. In this paper, we analyze the exact equation governing the radial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
