Star-formation rates from young-star counts and the structure of the ISM across the NGC346/N66 complex in the SMC
S. Hony, D. A. Gouliermis, F. Galliano, M. Galametz, D. Cormier, C.-H., R. Chen, S. Dib, A. Hughes, R. S. Klessen, J. Roman-Duval, L. Smith, J.-P., Bernard, C. Bot, L. Carlson, K. Gordon, R. Indebetouw, V. Lebouteiller, M.-Y., Lee, S. C. Madden, M. Meixner, J. Oliveira, M. Rubio

TL;DR
This study compares young-star and dust surface densities in NGC346/N66, revealing a strong correlation, variations in star formation efficiency, and discrepancies between different SFR estimation methods, enhancing understanding of star formation processes.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of star formation rates and efficiencies across different scales in NGC346/N66, highlighting environmental effects and methodological differences.
Findings
Strong correlation between young-star and dust surface densities with steep power-law relation.
Total star formation rate consistent with H-alpha estimates, but local SFRs vary significantly.
Variation in star formation efficiency between clustered and dispersed stellar populations.
Abstract
The rate at which interstellar gas is converted into stars, and its dependence on environment, is one of the pillars on which our understanding of the visible Universe is build. We present a comparison of the surface density of young stars (Sigma_*) and dust surface density (Sigma_d) across NGC346 (N66) in 115 independent pixels of 6x6 pc^2. We find a correlation between Sigma_* and Sigma_d with a considerable scatter. A power law fit to the data yields a steep relation with an exponent of 2.6+-0.2. We convert Sigma_d to gas surface density (Sigma_g) and Sigma_* to star formation rate (SFR) surface densities (Sigma_SFR), using simple assumptions for the gas-to-dust mass ratio and the duration of star formation. The derived total SFR (4+-1 10^-3 M_sun/yr) is consistent with SFR estimated from the Ha emission integrated over the Ha nebula. On small scales the Sigma_SFR derived using Ha…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
