Normalizing the causality between time series
X. San Liang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a normalized measure of causality between time series based on information flow, accounting for different mechanisms affecting entropy, with applications in climate and financial data analysis.
Contribution
It develops a normalization method for information flow causality, enabling more meaningful comparisons and applications to real-world climate and financial datasets.
Findings
Confirmed the Indian Ocean Dipole's role in El Niño unpredictability
Identified strong causality from IBM to GE in early computer market history
Demonstrated the importance of normalized causality measures in complex systems
Abstract
Recently, a rigorous yet concise formula has been derived to evaluate the information flow, and hence the causality in a quantitative sense, between time series. To assess the importance of a resulting causality, it needs to be normalized. The normalization is achieved through distinguishing three types of fundamental mechanisms that govern the marginal entropy change of the flow recipient. A normalized or relative flow measures its importance relative to other mechanisms. In analyzing realistic series, both absolute and relative information flows need to be taken into account, since the normalizers for a pair of reverse flows belong to two different entropy balances; it is quite normal that two identical flows may differ a lot in relative importance in their respective balances. We have reproduced these results with several autoregressive models. We have also shown applications to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
