Murray's law revisited: Qu\'emada's fluid model and fractal trees
Baptiste Moreau, Benjamin Mauroy

TL;DR
This paper revisits Murray's law for blood vessel design, extending it to shear-dependent Quémada fluids, and explores how viscosity effects influence optimal vessel and fractal tree geometries.
Contribution
It generalizes Murray's law to include shear-dependent viscosity models like Quémada's, and derives extended laws accounting for phase separation effects in microcirculation.
Findings
Murray's law is universal for Quémada's fluids without phase separation.
Phase separation effects lead to extended versions of Murray's law.
The study impacts the understanding of optimal arterial network geometries.
Abstract
In 1926, Murray proposed the first law for the optimal design of blood vessels. He minimized the power dissipation arising from the trade-off between fluid circulation and blood maintenance. The law, based on a constant fluid viscosity, states that in the optimal configuration the fluid flow rate inside the vessel is proportional to the cube of the vessel radius, implying that wall shear stress is not dependent on the vessel radius. Murray's law has been found to be true in blood macrocirculation, but not in microcirculation. In 2005, Alarc\'on et al took into account the non monotonous dependence of viscosity on vessel radius - F{\aa}hr{\ae}us-Lindqvist effect - due to phase separation effect of blood. They were able to predict correctly the behavior of wall shear stresses in microcirculation. One last crucial step remains however: to account for the dependence of blood viscosity on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
