Reconstructing the projected gravitational potential of Abell 1689 from X-ray measurements
Celine Tchernin, Charles L. Majer, Sven Meyer, Eleonora Sarli,, Dominique Eckert, Matthias Bartelmann

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the projected gravitational potential of galaxy clusters can be directly reconstructed from X-ray data using a novel Richardson-Lucy deprojection method, and validates this approach with Abell 1689, showing consistency with gravitational lensing results.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new non-parametric reconstruction method for galaxy cluster potentials from X-ray data and compares it with lensing measurements to test equilibrium assumptions.
Findings
X-ray based potential reconstruction agrees with lensing beyond 500 kpc.
The method allows independent deprojection of each line of sight.
Results suggest non-gravitational effects are significant in cluster centers.
Abstract
Context. Galaxy clusters can be used as cosmological probes, but to this end, they need to be thoroughly understood. Combining all cluster observables in a consistent way will help us to understand their global properties and their internal structure. Aims. We provide proof of the concept that the projected gravitational potential of galaxy clusters can directly be reconstructed from X-ray observations. We also show that this joint analysis can be used to locally test the validity of the equilibrium assumptions in galaxy clusters. Methods. We used a newly developed reconstruction method, based on Richardson-Lucy deprojection, that allows reconstructing projected gravitational potentials of galaxy clusters directly from X-ray observations. We applied this algorithm to the well-studied cluster Abell 1689 and compared the gravitational potential reconstructed from X-ray observables to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
